User agent detail

Motorola-ic902 Obigo/Q04C1 MMP/2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Motorolaic902 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 4.0 JAVA Motorolaic902Mobile Phoneyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Motorola-ic902 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM Motorolaic902mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Q04C1 Motorolaic902smartphoneyes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 4.1close Motorolaic902closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Q04C1 Browser Q04C1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 4C MotorolaIC902mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q04C1close Motorolaic902Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:47 | by ThaDafinser