User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (MTK; Opera Mini/2.1198/34.2336; U; fr) Presto/2.8.119 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-378.php
Opera Mini 2.0Android unknown2.2 unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 2.0Presto 2.2Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 2.1198close LGVN270mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 2.1198Presto MTK / Nucleus yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 2.1198close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 2.1198close closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 2.1198close closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 2.1198Presto 2.8.119 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 2Presto 2.8.119MRE mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 2.1close OperaMini 2Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.071 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:47 | by ThaDafinser