User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux 2.4.20-gentoo-r5 i686; U) Opera 7.11 [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Gentoo 2.4.20 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 7.11Presto 1.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 7.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 7.11closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 7.11Presto GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 7.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 7.11closeGentoo 2.4.20closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 7.11close closecloseclosecloseclose0.17802 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 7.11 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 7.11 Linux desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 7.11closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 7.54closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:47 | by ThaDafinser