User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SAMSUNG; SAMSUNG-GT-S8500/1.0; U; Linux/SLP/2.0; ko-kr) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dolfin/2.0 Mobile,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSAMSUNG-GT-S8500 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dolfin 2.0WebKit Bada 1.0Mobile Deviceyes0.245 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 2.0closeLinux SamsungGT S8500mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Dolphin 2.0WebKit GNU/Linux SamsungGT-S8500smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 2.0closeLinux SamsungSAMSUNG-GT-S8500closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.08401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 533.1Linux Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 2.0Webkit 533.1Bada 2.0SamsungWavemobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Dolfin Browser 3.0closeBada 2.0SamsungGT S8500Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:47 | by ThaDafinser