User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; b2w 0.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
yesFake IEBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake IEBot/Crawler0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 8.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 8.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 8.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 8.0close closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 8.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.37704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 8.0 closeclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 8(Compatibility View)closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:47 | by ThaDafinser