User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 4.2.2; en-US; Symphony_W128) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.0.2.389 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
UC Browser 9.0.2.389Android 4.2.2 SymphonyW128smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.0U2 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close SpiceMi-436mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.0 Android 4.2SymphonyW128smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.0.2closeAndroid 4.2.2closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.0.2.389 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45805 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.0Gecko Android 4.2.2SymphonyXplorer W128mobile:smartyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:47 | by ThaDafinser