User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; PalmSource/Palm-D053; Blazer/4.5) 16;320x320 UP.Link/6.3.1.17.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/pda/palm.yaml
Blazer 4.5Palm OS PalmTreo 680mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Win32 Windows DesktopDesktop0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Blazer 4.5closePalm OS PalmTreo 680mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Palm Blazer 4.5 palmOS PalmD053smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows 98closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Palm Blazer 4.5closeWindows 98 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Blazer 4.5closeWindows 98 closecloseclosecloseclose0.11401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Blazer 4.5 Palm OS PalmTreo 680mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 6.0closeWindows 98 PalmTreo 680Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:46 | by ThaDafinser