User agent detail

OneBrowser/3.1 (SonyEricssonJ10i2/R7CA061)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
OneBrowser 3.1 Sony EricssonElmmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
OneBrowser 3.1WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
OneBrowser 3.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
OneBrowser 3.1close Sony EricssonElmmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ONE Browser 3.1WebKit Sony EricssonElmfeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
ONE Browser 3.1close SonyEricssonJ10i2closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
OneBrowser 3.1 Sony EricssonSony Ericsson J10i2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.36604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
OneBrowser 3.1 Sony EricssonElmmobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:45 | by ThaDafinser