User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008072820 Kubuntu/8.04 (hardy) Firefox/3.0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox 3.0.1Kubuntu 8.04Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.0Gecko 1.9.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.0.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.0Gecko Kubuntu 8.04desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.0.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.0.1closeKubuntu closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.0.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.0.1Gecko 2008072820Linux 8.04closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.0.1Gecko 1.9.0Kubuntu 8.04desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.0.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:45 | by ThaDafinser