User agent detail

LG-GD900 Obigo/WAP2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0 UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; Pt-BR; LG-GD900 Obigo) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.3.0.326 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGGD900 Obigo Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-GD900 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.3 LGGD900smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.3.0close LGGD900 Obigocloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo WAP2 Browser WAP2 LGLGGD900closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo WAP 2.0Gecko LGGD900mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 9close LGGD900Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:45 | by ThaDafinser