User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/46.0.2486.0 Safari/537.36 Edge/13.10586
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-832.php
Edge 13.0Win10 10.013.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Edge 13.0Edge 13.0Win10 10.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Edge 13.10586closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 46.0.2486.0closeWindows 10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Microsoft Edge 13.10586Edge Windows 10desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Edge 13.10586closeWindows 10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Edge 13.10586closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Edge 13.10586closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Edge 13.10586WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Edge 13 EdgeHTML 13Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Edge 13.10586closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:44 | by ThaDafinser