User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (CrKey - 1.1.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1702.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/google.yaml
Chrome Dev 33.0.1702.0 Blink 537.36GoogleChromecasttelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1702.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 33.0.1702.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 33.0Blink GoogleChromecasttv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1702.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 33.0.1702close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 33.0.1702.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.10201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1702.0WebKit 537.36 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 33.0.1702.0Blink GoogleChromecasttelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1702.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:44 | by ThaDafinser