User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Diglo/28.0.1479.334 Chrome/28.0.1479.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
Diglo 28.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Diglo 28.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1479.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 28.0.1479.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.24902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 28.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1479.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 28.0.1479closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 28.0.1479.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 28.0.1479.0WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 28.0.1479.0Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 28.0.1479.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 28.0.1500.95closeWindows 8Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:43 | by ThaDafinser