User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows CE 6.0) AppleWebKit/534.51 (KHTML, like Gecko) MotorolaWebKit/2.2.3.10 Safari/534.51
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsce.yaml
Motorola WebKit 2.2.3Windows CE 6.0Webkit 534.51mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.51closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 534.51closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Windows CE MotorolarolaWebKitsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeWindows CE closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows CE 6.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 534.51Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola WebKit 2.2.3Webkit 534.51Windows CE 6.0mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux MotorolaEvokeFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:43 | by ThaDafinser