User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; GT-S5830ide_DE Build/GINGERBREAD) AppleWebKit/ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/ Mobile Safari/
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S5830ide_DE Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.042 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid 2.3.6GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3SamsungGT-S5830ide DEsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.6closeAndroid 2.3.6SamsungGT-S5830ide_DEcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.10201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3.6Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit Android 2.3.6SamsungGalaxy Acemobile:smartyescloseclose0.031 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.048 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:41 | by ThaDafinser