User agent detail

Midori/0.5 (X11; FreeBSD/11) WebKit/2.4.7 Midori/0.5.9
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-midori.yaml
Midori 0.5FreeBSD 11Webkit 2.4.7desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Midori 0.5WebKit FreeBSD Desktop0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Midori 0.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Midori 0.5closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Midori 0.5WebKit FreeBSD 11desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Midori 0.5.9closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Midori 0.5.9closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.07601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Midori 0.5WebKit 2.4.7FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Midori 0.5Webkit 2.4.7FreeBSD 11desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:41 | by ThaDafinser