User agent detail

SonyEricssonK200i/R1AA001 TelecaBrowser/1.1.14.20 UP.Link/6.3.0.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonK200i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonK200i R1AA001closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo 1.1.14.20close Sony EricssonK200imobile-browseryescloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Sony EricssonK200ifeature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close SonyEricssonK200icloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Teleca-Obigo 1.1.14.20close closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson K200icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo 1.1 Sony EricssonK200imobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonK200iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:40 | by ThaDafinser