User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/24.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-318.php
Firefox 24.0MacOSX 10.624.0 AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 24.0Gecko 24.0MacOSX 10.6AppleMacintoshDesktop0.046 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 24.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 24.0closeOS X 10.6desktop-browsercloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 24.0Gecko Mac 10.6desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 24.0closeOS X 10.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 24.0closeMac OS X 10.6closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 24.0closeOS X 10.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.08401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 24.0Gecko 20100101Mac OS X 10.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 24.0Gecko 24.0Mac OS X 10.6desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 24.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 24.0closeWindows 8Desktopcloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:40 | by ThaDafinser