User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; RAPAX 080-0508 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.72 Safari/537.36 OPR/16.0.1212.64462
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
CmxRAPAX 080-0508 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 16.0.1212.64462closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 16.0.1212.64462closeAndroid 4.0.4GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 16.0Blink Android 4.0yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 16.0.1212.64462closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 16.0.1212closeAndroid 4.0.4CmxRAPAX 080-0508closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.07301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 16.0.1212.64462WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 16.0Blink Android 4.0.4RAPAX 080-0508tabletyescloseclose0.081 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 16.0.1212.64462closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.048 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:40 | by ThaDafinser