User agent detail

HTC_HD2_T9193 Opera/9.7 (Windows NT 5.1; U; xx) V1.49.841.1 (71528)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Opera Mobile 9.7Windows Mobile HTCHD2mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 9.7Presto 2.2 HTCHD2 T9193Mobile Phoneyes0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 9.7closeWindows 5.1HTCT8585mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.7Presto Windows XPHTCHD2 T9193smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.7closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.7closeWindows XP HTCHD2_T9193closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.7closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.11201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.7 Windows Windows NT 5.1HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.48305 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 9.7 Windows Mobile HTCHD2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.7closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:39 | by ThaDafinser