User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; es-la; htc_s620) AppleWebKit/530.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/8.5.0.185/82/405/UCWEB Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCs620 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.089 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 530.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.5WebKit HTCs620smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.5.0close HTCs620closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.5.0.185WebKit 530.13 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.5Gecko Windows Mobile HTCS620 Excaliburmobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:39 | by ThaDafinser