User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; ZTE V765M Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.166 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
ZTEV765M Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.079 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750.166closeAndroid 4.2.2ZTEZTE LEO Q1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 33.0Blink Android 4.2ZTEV765Msmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750closeAndroid 4.2.2ZTEV765Mcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.166WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 33Blink Android 4.2.2ZTELEO Q1mobile:smartyescloseclose0.04 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 33closeAndroid 4.2ZTEZTE LEO Q1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.063 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:39 | by ThaDafinser