User agent detail

JUC(Linux;U;4.0.4;Zh_cn;GT-I9308;720*1280;)UCWEB7.7.0.85/139/999
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Android 4.0.4 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.7WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.7 GNU/Linux SamsungGT-I9308smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.7.0closeAndroid 4.0.4SamsungGT-I9308closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.7.0.85closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.7.0.85 Linux Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.7 Android 4.0.4SamsungGalaxy S IIImobile:smartyescloseclose0.036 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:39 | by ThaDafinser