User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone 5CGLOBAL; CPU iPhone OS 7_0_5 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 MQQBrowser/5.1.1 Mobile/11B601 Safari/8536.25
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
QQ Browser 5.1.1iOS 7.0.5WebKit AppleiPhone 5Csmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 6.0WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS 7.0.5AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 5.1WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPhone 5Csmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.0closeiOS 7.0.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 5.1.1closeiOS 7.0.5closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.0closeiPhone OS 7.0.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 5.1.1WebKit 537.51.1iOS 7.0.5AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 5.1Webkit 537.51.1iOS 7.0.5AppleiPhone 5mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:38 | by ThaDafinser