User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux i686; U; fr) Presto/2.10.287 Version/12.00 ; SC/IHD92 STB
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Opera 12.00GNU/Linux Presto OrangeLivebox Playtv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.00Presto 2.12Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.80closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.00Presto GNU/Linux OrangeLivebox Playtv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.00 ; SC/IHD92 STBcloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.0Presto 2.10.287Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 12.00Presto 2.10.287Linux desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:38 | by ThaDafinser