User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (X11; FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Opera 12.11FreeBSD 10.0Presto 2.12.388desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.11Presto 2.12FreeBSD Desktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.11closeBSD 10.0-CURRENTdesktop-browsercloseclose0.17602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.11Presto FreeBSD 10.0desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.11closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.11closeFreeBSD 10.0closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.11closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.08001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.11Presto 2.12.388FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 12.11Presto 2.12.388FreeBSD 10.0desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.11closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:37 | by ThaDafinser