User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/smartphone_ios.yaml
Safari 5.1iPod 5.0.1 smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.1WebKit iOS 5.0AppleiPod TouchMobile Deviceyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS 5.0.1AppleiPod Touchmobile-browseryescloseclose0.21202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 5.1WebKit iOS 5.0AppleiPod Touchportable media playeryes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.1closeiOS 5.0.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS 5.0.1AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.1closeiPhone OS 5.0.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.11201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari 5.1WebKit 534.46iOS 5.0.1AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.51705 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 534.46iOS 5.0.1AppleiPod touchmediayescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.1closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1.1closeiOS 5.1.1AppleiPod TouchOther Mobileyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:37 | by ThaDafinser