User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) OpenMandriva Chromium/34.0.1847.134 Chrome/34.0.1847.134 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Chromium 34.0.1847.134Mandriva Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 34.0Blink Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.052 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.134closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 34.0.1847.134closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 34.0Blink GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.134closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 34.0.1847closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.134closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 34.0.1847.134WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 34.0.1847.134Blink Mandriva desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.134closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeWindows 10Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:36 | by ThaDafinser