User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.3; U; Series60/3.2 Samsung/I7110/BOHK2 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/413
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungI7110 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Samsung Mobile Browser WebKit SymbianOS SamsungGT-I7110Mobile Phoneyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 413closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.3SamsungI7110mobile-browseryescloseclose0.81108 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 3.2WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 3.2SamsungI7110smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 3.2closeSymbian OS 9.3SamsungI7110closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 3.2closeSymbianOS 9.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.15902 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 413Symbian closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 413Series60 3.2SamsungI7110mobile:smartyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.3SamsungI7110Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:36 | by ThaDafinser