User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) QupZilla/1.6.6 Safari/538.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
QupZilla 1.6.6FreeBSD Webkit 538.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 538.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QupZilla 1.6.6closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit FreeBSD desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QupZilla 1.6.6closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.09901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QupZilla 1.6.6WebKit 538.1FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.59706 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QupZilla 1.6.6Webkit 538.1FreeBSD desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:36 | by ThaDafinser