User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; Avant Browser; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; InfoPath.2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-184.php
Avant 0.0Win7 6.14.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Avant Trident 4.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Avant Browser closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.25102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Avant Browser Trident Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Avant 1closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Avant Browser closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.08301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Avant Browser Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Avant Browser Trident 4.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 7.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:35 | by ThaDafinser