User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20141005 PaleMoon/25.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-457.php
PaleMoon 25.0Win7 6.125.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
PaleMoon 25.0Gecko 25.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Pale Moon 25.0.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Pale Moon 25.0Gecko Windows 7desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Pale Moon (Firefox Variant) 25.0.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Palemoon 25.0.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.09401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Pale Moon 25.0.0Gecko 20141005Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Pale Moon 25.0.0Gecko 25.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:34 | by ThaDafinser