User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; Google Page Speed Insights) Version/6.0 Mobile/10A525 Safari/8536.25
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-120.php
yesGoogle PageSpeed InsightsBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle PageSpeed InsightsBot/Crawler0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS 6.0.1AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGoogle PageSpeed InsightsSite Monitor0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.0closeiOS 6.0.1closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS 6.0.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.0closeiPhone OS 6.0.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari 6.0WebKit 537.36iOS 6.0.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGoogle Page Speedclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:34 | by ThaDafinser