User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.2; Series60/3.1 Nokia5700/3.27; Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) U; AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/413
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-series60.yaml
Series60 3.1Webkit 413Nokia5700 XpressMusicmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.249 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 413closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.2Nokiamobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 3.1WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 3.1Nokia5700smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 3.27;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 3.1closeSymbian OS 9.2Nokia5700closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 3.1closeSymbianOS 9.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 413NokiaOS NokiaNokia 5700closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 413Series60 3.1Nokia5700 XpressMusicmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 5.0NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:33 | by ThaDafinser