User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; S4005 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.92 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 41.0Android 4.2unknown DNSS4005Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 41.0Blink Android 4.2DNSS4005Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.92closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 41.0.2272.92closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 41.0Blink Android 4.2smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.92closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 41.0.2272closeAndroid 4.2.2S4005closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.09801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.92WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 41Blink Android 4.2.2S4005mobile:smartyescloseclose0.075 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.92closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:33 | by ThaDafinser