User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; SCH-I739 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.99 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSCH-I739 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 32.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungSCH-I739mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 32.0Blink Android 4.1SamsungSCH-I739smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 32.0.1700closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungSCH-I739closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.09501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 32.0.1700.99WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 32Blink Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Trend IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 32.0.1700.99closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 40closeAndroid 4.1SamsungSCH-I739Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.055 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:33 | by ThaDafinser