User agent detail

MT6515M-A1+/1.0 Linux/2.6.35.7 Android 2.3.6 Release/12.09.2012 Browser/AppleWebKit533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mozilla/5.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
Android 4.0Android 2.3unknown UnitedUtime S23Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3UnitedUtime S23Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MT6515M-A1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.6closeAndroid 2.3.6closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit Android 2.3.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.6MediatekMT6515 based devicedevboardcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.3closeAndroid 2.3ThLA1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:33 | by ThaDafinser