User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.3; Trident/7.0; Touch)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-523.php
IE 11.0Win8.1 6.37.0 unknowngeneral TabletTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 11.0Trident 7.0Win8.1 6.3Tabletyesyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 7.0closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.19802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident Windows 8.1tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 7.0closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 7.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:33 | by ThaDafinser