User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.1; zh-cn; R819T Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko)Version/4.0 MQQBrowser/6.0 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
QQ Browser 6.0Android 4.2.1WebKit OPPOR819Tsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.1OPPOR819Tmobile-browseryescloseclose0.34403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 6.0WebKit Android 4.2OPPOR819Tsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 6.0closeAndroid 4.2.1R819Tcloseclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.11401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 6.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 6.0Webkit 537.36Android 4.2.1OppoReal R819Tmobile:smartyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2OPPOR819TSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.041 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:33 | by ThaDafinser