User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; KFTHWI Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AmazonKindle Fire HDX 7" WiFi Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.135 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.29303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.2AmazonKindle Fire HDX 7" WiFitabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.2.2AmazonKindle Fire HDX 7" WiFicloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.18102 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166WebKit 535.19Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Amazon WebView Webkit 535.19FireOS 3AmazonKindle Fire HDXtabletyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.2AmazonKindle Fire HDX 7Tabletyesyescloseclose0.058 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:32 | by ThaDafinser