User agent detail

IEMobile/v6.0 LG-GM730/V20b Browser/IE8.12 MMS/LGMMSv1.0/1.2 Java/LGVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1/Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC)/UC Browser7.8.0.95
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGGM730 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.8WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile v6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 4.01closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.8 Windows CE LGGM730smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.8.0closeWindows CE LGGM730closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 6.0closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.08101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.8Gecko Windows Mobile LGEigen GM730mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:32 | by ThaDafinser