User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) KHTML/4.11.5 (like Gecko) Konqueror/4.11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-295.php
Konqueror 4.11Linux unknown4.11 unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 4.11KHTML 4.11Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.11closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.23402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.11KHTML GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.11closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 4.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.11 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.11KHTML 4.11.5Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:32 | by ThaDafinser