User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:19.0) Gecko/19.0 Firefox/19.0 SeaMonkey/2.16a1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-seamonkey.yaml
SeaMonkey 2.16a1Linux Gecko 19.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SeaMonkey 2.16Gecko Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 19.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
SeaMonkey 2.16a1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SeaMonkey 2.16Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
SeaMonkey 2.16a1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 2.16.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SeaMonkey 2.16a1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.10001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Seamonkey 2.16a1Gecko 19.0Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SeaMonkey 2.16a1Gecko 19.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 19.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 19.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:32 | by ThaDafinser