User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 (x86_64); rv:2.0b4) Gecko/20100818 Firefox/4.0b4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Linux Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 4.0Gecko 2.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 4.0b4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 4.0b4closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 4.0Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 4.0b4closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox Beta 4.0.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 4.0b4closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.15402 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 4.0b4Gecko 20100818Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Beta 4.0b4Gecko 2.0b4Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 4.0.1closeMac OS X 10.6Desktopcloseclose0.073 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:32 | by ThaDafinser