User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 4.1.2; ru; GT-P3110) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/10.1.2.571 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 10.1Android 4.1unknown SamsungGalaxy Tab 2 7.0Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 10.1U2 Android 4.1SamsungGalaxy Tab 2 7.0Tabletyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close SamsungGT-I8552mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 10.1 Android 4.1SamsungGALAXY Tab 2 7" WiFitabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.1.2closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungGT-P3110closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.13501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 10.1.2.571 SamsungMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 10.1Gecko Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Tab 2 (7.0)tabletyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:32 | by ThaDafinser