User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.1.0 Waterfox/38.1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
Waterfox 38.1Win10 10.038.1 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Waterfox 38.1Gecko 38.1Win10 10.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 38.1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 38.1.0closeWindows 10.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.26603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 38.1Gecko Windows 10desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 38.1.0closeWindows 10.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 38.1.0closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 38.1.0closeWindows 10 closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 38.1.0Gecko 20100101Windows Windows NT 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Waterfox 38.1Gecko 38.0Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 38.1.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 38.0closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:32 | by ThaDafinser