User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Google Wireless Transcoder;)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-ios.yaml
yesGoogle Wireless Transcoder Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Win2000 5.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesGoogle Wireless Transcoderclose0.21002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeWindows 2000 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows 2000 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGoogle Wireless Transcoderclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:31 | by ThaDafinser