User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/38.0.2125.101 Safari/537.36 OPR/25.0.1614.50 (Edition Ask)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-498.php
Opera 25.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 25.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.139 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 25.0.1614.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 25.0.1614.50closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 25.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 25.0.1614.50closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 25.0.1614closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.101closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 25.0.1614.50WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 25.0Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 25.0.1614.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 25.0.1614.50closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:31 | by ThaDafinser