User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; Win64; x64; rv:25.1) Gecko/20141110 PaleMoon/25.1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
PaleMoon 25.1WinVista 6.025.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
PaleMoon 25.1Gecko 25.0WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Pale Moon 25.1.0closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Pale Moon 25.1Gecko Windows Vistadesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Pale Moon (Firefox Variant) 25.1.0closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Palemoon 25.1.0closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Pale Moon 25.1.0Gecko 20141110Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Pale Moon 25.1.0Gecko 25.1Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:30 | by ThaDafinser