User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (CrKey armv7l 1.2.13300) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.0.1410.0 Safari/537.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/google.yaml
Chrome 26 Webkit 537.31GoogleChromecasttelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 26.0WebKit Desktop0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 26.0.1410.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 26.0WebKit GoogleChromecasttv0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 26.0.1410close closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 26.0.1410.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.21802 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 26.0.1410.0WebKit 537.31 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 26Webkit 537.31 GoogleChromecasttelevisioncloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:39:30 | by ThaDafinser